Re: [PATCH 0/9] genetlink: reduce ops size and complexity (v2)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 14:18:35 +0100

> We could instead register an array of pointers to the groups:
> 
> static const struct mcast_group *my_groups[] = {
> 	&my_foo_mcast_group,
> 	...
> };
> 
> and pass this to the family - that'd still be less space (one pointer
> for each group rather than two in a linked list) and still allow all
> groups and this array to be const, but it's not quite as big a
> saving ...
> 
> Thoughts?

This idea sounds fine.  I don't even thing the array indexing is
odd, especially if we can have named mnenomics for the indices
or similar.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux