Re: [PATCH 0/9] genetlink: reduce ops size and complexity (v2)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Are we killing APIs that are already used?
At least that patches that Dave sucked in do. Out of tree
users dont matter?

cheers,
jamal

On 11/15/13 08:23, Johannes Berg wrote:
On Fri, 2013-11-15 at 14:18 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:

I've been eyeing the multicast groups as well

Of course, there are also *much* fewer mcast groups, so the saving isn't
nearly as big. But we still have some oddball code to register them all,
basically

	err = register_mc_group();
	if (err)
		goto unregister_family;

(since we have to register the family first, afaict)

sometimes a few of those back to back, and it'd be nicer on the users if
that just went away and was

	family.mcast_groups = my_groups;
	family.n_mcast_groups = ARRAY_SIZE(my_groups);
	family.ops = my_ops;
	family.n_ops = ARRAY_SIZE(my_ops);
	return genl_register_family(&family);

since nobody uses them dynamically anyway, afaict.

johannes

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux