On Wed, 2013-05-01 at 17:17 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 05:46:37AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > If the only goal is to allow preemption, and if long grace periods are > > not a concern, then this alternate approach would work fine as well. > > Hmm.. if that were the goal I'd like it to have a different name; > cond_resched*() has always been about preemption. BTW, I do not remember why cond_resched() is not an empty macro when CONFIG_PREEMPT=y ? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
