On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 05:46:37AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > If the only goal is to allow preemption, and if long grace periods are > not a concern, then this alternate approach would work fine as well. Hmm.. if that were the goal I'd like it to have a different name; cond_resched*() has always been about preemption. > Of course, both approaches assume that the caller is in a place > where having all RCU-protected data disappear is OK! Quite :-) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
