Re: CRYPT target patch for newer kernel ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wednesday 2012-08-08 16:15, Arif Hossain wrote:

>On Wed, 2012-08-08 at 16:15 +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
><snip>
>> You can probably even use IPsec without StrongSWAN, if you manage to 
>> knit together the pieces using `ip xfrm state` and `ip xfrm policy`.
>> 
>
>I guess i'm not clarifying my issue transparently. The client device is
>far from linux or POSIX etc. Its ip stack does not have IPSEC either.
>And its a vendor locked thing. We can install userland stuff. nothing
>else. And to if i'm not wrong ,to enable IPSEC, we need to first port it
>to the client machine. And its not possible and not feasible. We just
>want to encrypt the UDP traffic. 

If it is not linux, it's pretty much irrelevant for this discussion 
group.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux