Re: CRYPT target patch for newer kernel ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wednesday 2012-08-08 15:53, Arif Hossain wrote:
>On Wed, 2012-08-08 at 15:41 +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>> On Wednesday 2012-08-08 14:25, Arif Hossain wrote:
><snip>
>> Complicated? No, not at all. http://inai.de/2008/02/24
>> Heavyweight? Neither. The RSS is ~5 MB, most of which is pretty much
>> glibc anyway.
>
>If clients are mainly embedded devices, and most of the time, all we can
>do is to install a software on them, then is it feasible to use IPSEC?

You can probably even use IPsec without StrongSWAN, if you manage to 
knit together the pieces using `ip xfrm state` and `ip xfrm policy`.


>Just for an example, we used tls for only the initial session
>establishment, not the original data, and it proved very inefficient so
>we had to abandon the thing completely.

So perhaps you did something really wrong?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux