Re: Regarding connection mappings to module data structures

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 14-Jun-2012, at 23:57, Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 02:18:33PM +0800, Deepak Jangid wrote:
>> Hello Netfilter team,
>>  
>> I am seeking an infrastructure for mapping
>> conntrack(struct nf_conn) to a module private data structure as a context for
>> every connection.
>> I could not find any such.
>>  
>> I can add the private info when I see a new connection.
>> conntrack destroy events can be caught to destroy the
>> private structure.
>> But the thing is there is no mechanism to store the
>> private info mapped to a connection. Either I will have to maintain
>> hash-tables, which is highly irrelevant, or edit the nf_conn which seems a
>> better way.
>>  
>> What I was thinking is to have a list_head or a pointer
>> to a structure in nf_conn which can handle such scenarios.
>>  
>> Does this seems generic ? Well yes there is
>> conntrack_extend, but it is not generic to be usable by other modules.
> 
> But my guess is that conntrack extensions is what you want. See
> net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_extend.c and
> net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_timestamp.c for one example.

Yes exactly, that is what I am talking about. But you see 
Struct nf_ct_ext_type .id is what bugging me. 
It is not generic i'll have to add an enum to use it.

What I am suggesting is that we should make it general registrable.

Well you asked, what I am trying to do is make an 7th layer application filter.

Best regards,
Deepak jangid--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux