>On Mon, 2012-05-14 at 21:02 +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > >> IIRC, Hans wants that, in case you have a cluster composed of system >> with different endianess, the hash mark calculated will be the same >> in both systems. To ensure that the distribution is consistent with >> independency of the endianess. > >Then jhash() must be audited to make sure its output is OK with this >requirement. Have done that, and made tests on a mips 32 running debian It was as expected jhash3_words is endian safe, while jhash() is not -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
