On Monday 2012-05-14 19:51, Hans Schillstrom wrote: >On Monday 14 May 2012 18:24:34 Eric Dumazet wrote: >> On Mon, 2012-05-14 at 18:09 +0200, Hans Schillstrom wrote: >> >> > This context can contain both le & be machines, >> > so at least in hmark it make sense >> >> Before jhash() and its shuffle ? What do you mean ? > >I want that a Big endian machine should produce the same >hash value independent of flow direction as a Little endian. But one does not really need that, since the hash is only used locally. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html