On Monday 2012-05-14 16:18, David Laight wrote:
>
>> NFPROTO_* constants were usually equal to PF_* constants but it is not
>> necessary and it will waste less memory if we don't do so
>> (see commit 7e9c6e
>> "netfilter: Introduce NFPROTO_* constants")
>...
>>
>> static struct nf_hook_ops dnrmg_ops __read_mostly = {
>> .hook = dnrmg_hook,
>> - .pf = PF_DECnet,
>> + .pf = NFPROTO_DECNET,
>> .hooknum = NF_DN_ROUTE,
>> .priority = NF_DN_PRI_DNRTMSG,
>> };
>
>Might it be worth renaming the .pf member to (say) .nfproto
>to help avoid confusion?
Yes that seems like a sensible thing.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
