David Laight <David.Laight@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > NFPROTO_* constants were usually equal to PF_* constants but it is not > > necessary and it will waste less memory if we don't do so > > (see commit 7e9c6e > > "netfilter: Introduce NFPROTO_* constants") > ... > > > > static struct nf_hook_ops dnrmg_ops __read_mostly = { > > .hook = dnrmg_hook, > > - .pf = PF_DECnet, > > + .pf = NFPROTO_DECNET, > > .hooknum = NF_DN_ROUTE, > > .priority = NF_DN_PRI_DNRTMSG, > > }; > > Might it be worth renaming the .pf member to (say) .nfproto > to help avoid confusion? NFPROTO_* values are exported to userspace, so I don't think its safe to change these values. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html