Am 04.03.2012 12:12, schrieb Pablo Neira Ayuso: > On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 05:52:50PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote: >> Am 02.03.2012 17:49, schrieb Pablo Neira Ayuso: >>> On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 10:39:15PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote: >>>> Am 01.03.2012 12:27, schrieb Pablo Neira Ayuso: >>>>> While merging ipt_LOG and ip6t_LOG, you introduced some bug that >>>>> corrupts the log line. Note the extra PROTO=, I don't have any UDPLITE >>>>> traffic here. >>>>> >>>>> Looks like a missing break in one switch. >>>> >>>> I got confused by my own logic. :-\ >>>> Does the attached patch fix the issue? >>>> It's based on "Netfilter: xt_LOG: Add timestamp support" >>> >>> This patch lacks of description. If you don't make it myself, I have >>> to do it for you :-( >>> >>> Please, send me patches following the standard format next time. >> >> It was a "does this patch solve the problem"-Patch. >> Does it fix the problem? >> >> If so, I'll send an official one... > > Sorry, that's too much overhead. I don't mind testing it, but I want > to apply it as soon as it fixes the problem ;-) > I'll try to reproduce your problem and test the fix for my own. Thanks, //richard
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
