Am 02.03.2012 17:49, schrieb Pablo Neira Ayuso: > On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 10:39:15PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote: >> Am 01.03.2012 12:27, schrieb Pablo Neira Ayuso: >>> While merging ipt_LOG and ip6t_LOG, you introduced some bug that >>> corrupts the log line. Note the extra PROTO=, I don't have any UDPLITE >>> traffic here. >>> >>> Looks like a missing break in one switch. >> >> I got confused by my own logic. :-\ >> Does the attached patch fix the issue? >> It's based on "Netfilter: xt_LOG: Add timestamp support" > > This patch lacks of description. If you don't make it myself, I have > to do it for you :-( > > Please, send me patches following the standard format next time. It was a "does this patch solve the problem"-Patch. Does it fix the problem? If so, I'll send an official one... Thanks, //richard
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
