On 15.07.2011 01:17, David Miller wrote: > From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 01:15:47 +0200 (CEST) > >> Of course yours is feature-richer. But the topic of IPv6 NAT has had >> come up a number of unrecollectable times, and the response has been the >> same everytime - NAT is still an ugly undesired hack whose recurrence >> wants to be avoided. > > You can't avoid it. > > People want to hide the details of the topology of their > internal networks, therefore we will have NAT with ipv6 > no matter what we think or feel. I agree, the multiple existing implementations are proof of that. > Everyone needs to stop being in denial, now. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
