On Thursday 2011-04-14 09:12, Brian G wrote: > On 4/14/2011 2:03 AM, Jan Engelhardt wrote: >> On Sunday 2011-04-03 02:07, Brian G wrote: >>> On 4/2/2011 6:55 PM, Sam Roberts wrote: >>>> On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 1:23 AM, Brian G<unixman83@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> Does the conntrack -L output have the info you'd like? >>> Probably. Too bad my distro (CentOS) doesn't seem to provide this binary. >> Ye, enterprise distributions have a bad track record for shipping the >> complete NF suite. Avoid :/ > > TPROXY will work, it should become commonplace by the time IPv6 gets going > strong. Someone on stackoverflow answered my question, although he called > tproxy a 'hack'. It will work fine so long as it doesn't hinder performance. Hey, if TPROXY is a hack, so is the entire NAT business in itself! :) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
