Am 20.01.2011 20:57, schrieb Eric Dumazet: > Le jeudi 20 janvier 2011 Ã 20:18 +0100, Patrick McHardy a Ãcrit : >> Am 20.01.2011 18:53, schrieb Eric Dumazet: >>> After commit ae90bdeaeac6b (netfilter: fix compilation when conntrack is >>> disabled but tproxy is enabled) we have following warnings : >>> >>> net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_conntrack_reasm.c:520:16: warning: symbol >>> 'nf_ct_frag6_gather' was not declared. Should it be static? >>> net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_conntrack_reasm.c:591:6: warning: symbol >>> 'nf_ct_frag6_output' was not declared. Should it be static? >>> net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_conntrack_reasm.c:612:5: warning: symbol >>> 'nf_ct_frag6_init' was not declared. Should it be static? >>> net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_conntrack_reasm.c:640:6: warning: symbol >>> 'nf_ct_frag6_cleanup' was not declared. Should it be static? >>> >>> Fix this including net/netfilter/ipv6/nf_defrag_ipv6.h >>> >> >> I currently don't have access to all my trees, does this patch >> apply to 2.6.38 or just the current -rc? > > I dont really understand the question. > > Or do you mean 2.6.37 versus 2.6.38-rc1 ? Right, that was a typo. > It's a minor correction anyway, not a stable candidate. It would be good > to push it for current (2.6.38) Applied, thanks. I'll push this together with a bunch of other fixes to Dave later tonight. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
