Am 20.01.2011 18:53, schrieb Eric Dumazet: > After commit ae90bdeaeac6b (netfilter: fix compilation when conntrack is > disabled but tproxy is enabled) we have following warnings : > > net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_conntrack_reasm.c:520:16: warning: symbol > 'nf_ct_frag6_gather' was not declared. Should it be static? > net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_conntrack_reasm.c:591:6: warning: symbol > 'nf_ct_frag6_output' was not declared. Should it be static? > net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_conntrack_reasm.c:612:5: warning: symbol > 'nf_ct_frag6_init' was not declared. Should it be static? > net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_conntrack_reasm.c:640:6: warning: symbol > 'nf_ct_frag6_cleanup' was not declared. Should it be static? > > Fix this including net/netfilter/ipv6/nf_defrag_ipv6.h > I currently don't have access to all my trees, does this patch apply to 2.6.38 or just the current -rc? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
