On Thursday 2010-12-16 08:28, Patrick McHardy wrote: >>> >>> Both I guess, but I was previously referring to the kernel. >> >> I do not see the issue with using POSIX types outside of operating >> system interface specifications. >> So I guess this is in order: >> >> parent 3a84b3d5de492e40aff7bae5038b06dd6b6041c4 (v1.4.10-17-g3a84b3d) >> commit a069355b7933c9afe38b5cb7b251b2ece4fe8456 >> Author: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx> >> Date: Thu Dec 16 00:59:27 2010 +0100 >> >> src: use C99/POSIX types >> >> "u_int" was a non-standardized extension predating C99 on some platforms. > >While I don't have a real personal preference, most of the remaining >networking stack uses uXX types and I know code has been actively >converted from C99 types to those. So for consistency we should also >use uXX. Sorry for not being clearer about that before. So is it ok if I push this patch along with the next batch? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
