Le mercredi 17 novembre 2010 Ã 22:54 +0800, Changli Gao a Ãcrit : > When reviewing the iptables code, I find there is one exact copy of > table on every possible CPU for parallel processing. However, only > counters are private, and the others are the same. It is a wast of > memory. I know the current implementation maybe good for NUMA, but I > don't think NUMA is common, and I doubt its benefit. I'll try to > convert the code use one shared table, but private counters. > > Any comment? > This idea is not new, and I believe Patrick is already working on it. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
