Am 15.10.2010 17:25, schrieb Jan Engelhardt: > On Friday 2010-10-15 17:22, Patrick McHardy wrote: > >> Am 13.10.2010 22:25, schrieb Eric Paris: >>> The current secmark code exports a secmark= field which just indicates if >>> there is special labeling on a packet or not. We drop this field as it >>> isn't particularly useful and instead export a new field secctx= which is >>> the actual human readable text label. >> >> We usually don't do this to avoid breaking parsers, however in >> this case the field was dependant on a config option anyways, >> so userspace must already be prepared that it is missing. > > But do we really /have/ to add more and more stuff to procfs? As long as we don't add new files, I don't really mind. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
