Re: [PATCH 4/4] secmark: export secctx, drop secmark in procfs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 15.10.2010 17:25, schrieb Jan Engelhardt:
> On Friday 2010-10-15 17:22, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> 
>> Am 13.10.2010 22:25, schrieb Eric Paris:
>>> The current secmark code exports a secmark= field which just indicates if
>>> there is special labeling on a packet or not.  We drop this field as it
>>> isn't particularly useful and instead export a new field secctx= which is
>>> the actual human readable text label.
>>
>> We usually don't do this to avoid breaking parsers, however in
>> this case the field was dependant on a config option anyways,
>> so userspace must already be prepared that it is missing.
> 
> But do we really /have/ to add more and more stuff to procfs?

As long as we don't add new files, I don't really mind.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux