On Friday 2010-10-15 17:22, Patrick McHardy wrote: >Am 13.10.2010 22:25, schrieb Eric Paris: >> The current secmark code exports a secmark= field which just indicates if >> there is special labeling on a packet or not. We drop this field as it >> isn't particularly useful and instead export a new field secctx= which is >> the actual human readable text label. > >We usually don't do this to avoid breaking parsers, however in >this case the field was dependant on a config option anyways, >so userspace must already be prepared that it is missing. But do we really /have/ to add more and more stuff to procfs? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
