Le mardi 13 avril 2010 à 12:51 +0200, Jan Engelhardt a écrit : > On Tuesday 2010-04-13 12:00, Patrick McHardy wrote: > >Jan Engelhardt wrote: > >> --- a/net/netfilter/xt_TEE.c > >> +++ b/net/netfilter/xt_TEE.c > >> @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ static struct nf_conn tee_track; > >> #endif > >> > >> static const union nf_inet_addr tee_zero_address; > >> +static bool tee_active[NR_CPUS]; > > > >DEFINE_PER_CPU? > > I asked about that. It seems like percpu.h puts the variable in an extra > section and with pretty much #define magic around it (e.g. look at the > #definition of percpu_set) all of which did not seem necessary to me. You must be kidding ;) percpu access is pretty fast these days, thanks to latest work from Tejun Heo On x86, this is one segment override, exactly one byte, to read/write on a percpu variable. Please try it :) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
