Jan Engelhardt wrote: > On Tuesday 2010-04-13 12:00, Patrick McHardy wrote: >> Jan Engelhardt wrote: >>> --- a/net/netfilter/xt_TEE.c >>> +++ b/net/netfilter/xt_TEE.c >>> @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ static struct nf_conn tee_track; >>> #endif >>> >>> static const union nf_inet_addr tee_zero_address; >>> +static bool tee_active[NR_CPUS]; >> DEFINE_PER_CPU? > > I asked about that. It seems like percpu.h puts the variable in an extra > section and with pretty much #define magic around it (e.g. look at the > #definition of percpu_set) all of which did not seem necessary to me. > It should avoid having a huge array that bounces between CPUs since their entries are located next to each other. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
