Re: [PATCH 8/9] netfilter: xtables: inclusion of xt_TEE

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tuesday 2010-03-23 13:38, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>
>> 1. sending the clone through a tunnel - admin can't do much about MTU getting
>> smaller here.
>
>It either happens locally (before encapsulation) or for the
>encapsulated packets, which isn't a problem.

That is what I am referring to. Suppose -j TEE is using
a --gateway address whose route resolves to

default dev ipip0 [mtu 1480]

(There is no encapsulation or MTU decrease on the original path.) The
admin then has two possibilities, to either drop the clone, or coerce
the source in sending appropriately-sized packets.

>> 2. the PTB may take longer to reach the source due to internet
>> routing - nothing the admin can really influence either.
>
>He should make sure any messages generated in response to duplicated
>packets are not routed or dropped.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux