Re: [PATCH 8/9] netfilter: xtables: inclusion of xt_TEE

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tuesday 2010-03-23 13:04, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>> 
>>>> Setting IP_DF on the cloned skb could possibly lead to a Packet Too
>>>> Big being sent back to the original sender - which should probably be
>>>> avoided too.
>>> Indeed. This might also happen if the packet is passed through another
>>> router of course.
>> 
>> Right. So let's set IP_DF on the teed packet and let the sender
>> reduce its packet size to accomodate for the (hidden) tee route :)
>> 
>> Is it ok if the Packet Too Big notification is received by the
>> original sender much later than an acknowledgement in reception to
>> the packet?
>
>I think its the responsibility of the admin to make sure that
>doesn't happen.

Is that so?

1. sending the clone through a tunnel - admin can't do much about MTU getting
smaller here.

2. the PTB may take longer to reach the source due to internet
routing - nothing the admin can really influence either.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux