John Haxby wrote: > On 20/03/10 01:47, Jan Engelhardt wrote: >> On Wednesday 2010-03-17 15:43, Patrick McHardy wrote: >> >>> It seems useful to me, I'm mainly wondering whether there's a chance >>> that we'll get kdboe support in the forseeable future, which would >>> make this pretty much obsolete I guess. >>> >> Well once there's kdboe, we can reevaluate and delete it again. >> Which brings me to the point: is kdboe even secured? >> > > > And does it have the useful low-overhead that xt_SYSRQ has which means > it works even when the rest of the system is in deep trouble? I guess it should. But from what I could find, there are no plans to merge this in the near term. > > (I can't find kbdoe, google has let me down.) Perhaps try kdboe :) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
