Re: [PATCH 7/9] netfilter: xtables: inclusion of xt_SYSRQ

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 20/03/10 01:47, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
On Wednesday 2010-03-17 15:43, Patrick McHardy wrote:
It seems useful to me, I'm mainly wondering whether there's a chance
that we'll get kdboe support in the forseeable future, which would
make this pretty much obsolete I guess.
Well once there's kdboe, we can reevaluate and delete it again.
Which brings me to the point: is kdboe even secured?


And does it have the useful low-overhead that xt_SYSRQ has which means it works even when the rest of the system is in deep trouble?

(I can't find kbdoe, google has let me down.)

jch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux