On 03/17/2010 01:50 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
Le mercredi 17 mars 2010 à 13:44 -0600, Tim Gardner a écrit :
On 03/17/2010 01:34 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
Le mercredi 17 mars 2010 à 12:48 -0600, Tim Gardner a écrit :
diff --git a/extensions/libxt_recent.man b/extensions/libxt_recent.man
index 532c328..26e4fb9 100644
--- a/extensions/libxt_recent.man
+++ b/extensions/libxt_recent.man
@@ -41,6 +41,11 @@ This option must be used in conjunction with one of \fB\-\-rcheck\fP or
\fB\-\-update\fP. When used, this will narrow the match to only happen when the
address is in the list and was seen within the last given number of seconds.
.TP
+\fB\-\-reap\fP \fIreap\fP
+This option must be used in conjunction with \fB\-\-seconds\fP. When used, this
+will remove entries with the most recent timestamp older then \fB\-\-seconds\fP
+since the last packet was received.
+.TP
\fB\-\-hitcount\fP \fIhits\fP
This option must be used in conjunction with one of \fB\-\-rcheck\fP or
\fB\-\-update\fP. When used, this will narrow the match to only happen when the
Are you sure this "most recent timestamp older then " is correct ? ;)
That does kind of make my head hurt. Perhaps it is better stated, "When
used, this will remove entries that have not received a packet in the
time specified by --seconds."
Well, it will remove the oldest entry, if its age is more than time
specifed by --seconds.
ie you wrote "most recent" instead of "least recent" ----> "oldest"
Which is probably why my head hurt. Do you agree that the second version
is clearer?
rtg
--
Tim Gardner timg@xxxxxxx www.tpi.com
OR 503-601-0234 x102 MT 406-443-5357
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
