Le mercredi 17 mars 2010 à 13:44 -0600, Tim Gardner a écrit : > On 03/17/2010 01:34 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote: > > Le mercredi 17 mars 2010 à 12:48 -0600, Tim Gardner a écrit : > >> diff --git a/extensions/libxt_recent.man b/extensions/libxt_recent.man > >> index 532c328..26e4fb9 100644 > >> --- a/extensions/libxt_recent.man > >> +++ b/extensions/libxt_recent.man > >> @@ -41,6 +41,11 @@ This option must be used in conjunction with one of \fB\-\-rcheck\fP or > >> \fB\-\-update\fP. When used, this will narrow the match to only happen when the > >> address is in the list and was seen within the last given number of seconds. > >> .TP > >> +\fB\-\-reap\fP \fIreap\fP > >> +This option must be used in conjunction with \fB\-\-seconds\fP. When used, this > >> +will remove entries with the most recent timestamp older then \fB\-\-seconds\fP > >> +since the last packet was received. > >> +.TP > >> \fB\-\-hitcount\fP \fIhits\fP > >> This option must be used in conjunction with one of \fB\-\-rcheck\fP or > >> \fB\-\-update\fP. When used, this will narrow the match to only happen when the > > > > Are you sure this "most recent timestamp older then " is correct ? ;) > > > > > > > > That does kind of make my head hurt. Perhaps it is better stated, "When > used, this will remove entries that have not received a packet in the > time specified by --seconds." > Well, it will remove the oldest entry, if its age is more than time specifed by --seconds. ie you wrote "most recent" instead of "least recent" ----> "oldest" -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
