On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 9:51 AM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Le jeudi 18 février 2010 à 09:40 -0800, Afi Gjermund a écrit : >> I am still trying to figure out why the nf_conntrack_count differs >> from the table system. I decided I would use the conntrack userspace >> tools. >> Both of my NICs are unplugged with no other userspace applications >> running to affect connection tracking counts. >> >> >> root@titan ~# date >> Thu Feb 18 17:35:21 UTC 2010 >> >> root@titan ~# ./conntrack -C conntrack >> 351 >> >> root@titan ~# date >> Thu Feb 18 17:35:24 UTC 2010 >> >> root@titan ~# ./conntrack -F conntrack >> conntrack v0.9.14 (conntrack-tools): connection tracking table has been emptied. >> >> root@titan ~# date >> Thu Feb 18 17:35:31 UTC 2010 >> >> root@titan ~# ./conntrack -C conntrack >> 351 >> >> root@titan ~# date >> Thu Feb 18 17:35:36 UTC 2010 >> >> Shouldn't the value after the flush be 0? The traffic that has created >> this mess is from a REDIRECT rule in the PREROUTING chain of the 'nat' >> table. > > Could you post a copy of these rules ? > > Thanks > > > iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp -s X.X.X.X -d X.X.X.X --sport X --dport X -j REDIRECT --to-port X -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html