Re: nf_conntrack_count versus '/proc/net/nf_conntrack | wc -l' count

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Le jeudi 18 février 2010 à 09:40 -0800, Afi Gjermund a écrit :
> I am still trying to figure out why the nf_conntrack_count differs
> from the table system.  I decided I would use the conntrack userspace
> tools.
> Both of my NICs are unplugged with no other userspace applications
> running to affect connection tracking counts.
> 
> 
> root@titan ~# date
> Thu Feb 18 17:35:21 UTC 2010
> 
> root@titan ~# ./conntrack -C conntrack
> 351
> 
> root@titan ~# date
> Thu Feb 18 17:35:24 UTC 2010
> 
> root@titan ~# ./conntrack -F conntrack
> conntrack v0.9.14 (conntrack-tools): connection tracking table has been emptied.
> 
> root@titan ~# date
> Thu Feb 18 17:35:31 UTC 2010
> 
> root@titan ~# ./conntrack -C conntrack
> 351
> 
> root@titan ~# date
> Thu Feb 18 17:35:36 UTC 2010
> 
> Shouldn't the value after the flush be 0? The traffic that has created
> this mess is from a REDIRECT rule in the PREROUTING chain of the 'nat'
> table.

Could you post a copy of these rules ?

Thanks


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux