Re: [RFC 0/9] snet: Security for NETwork syscalls

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Samir Bellabes wrote:
> I'm currently testing security_sock_rcv_skb() hook - which is inside
> sk_filter() - to get skbuffs when then are arriving, and so trying to
> push the buffer to userspace. In case this is not userfull, userspace
> is able to use the NFQUEUE of netfilter to get skbuff, and deal
> with incoming datas.

Pushing buffer to userspace and wait for userspace's decision will sleep.
sk_filter() which calls security_sock_rcv_skb() hook is called from
(e.g.) tcp_v6_do_rcv() and comment of tcp_v6_do_rcv() says that
"The socket must have it's spinlock held when we get here." 
Also, comment of rxrpc_queue_rcv_skb() says that
"the caller must hold a lock on call->lock".
I think it is not permitted to do sleeping operation inside
security_sock_rcv_skb().
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux