Re: [patch] ipvs: fwmark services don't have ports

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 02:55:05PM +1100, Simon Horman wrote:
> Make sure that the port for fwmark services is always zero, it seems that
> in some cases ipvsadm provides bogus port values for fwmark services.  As
> observed by Deon van der Merwe, this manifests as a clients not being able
> to connect to the virtual service if persistence is set.
> 
> Tested-by: Deon van der Merwe <dvdm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> --- 
> 
> I believe that this fixes a bug and as such is suitable for -stable.
> However, Its taken a few release for anyone to bring this to our attention,
> so it doesn't seem to be causing much pain in the wild.
> 
> Discussion of this problem:
> http://archive.linuxvirtualserver.org/html/lvs-users/2009-11/msg00043.html

Sorry for the noise. Please hold on this.
There is still not consensus in the original thread.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux