[patch] ipvs: fwmark services don't have ports

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Make sure that the port for fwmark services is always zero, it seems that
in some cases ipvsadm provides bogus port values for fwmark services.  As
observed by Deon van der Merwe, this manifests as a clients not being able
to connect to the virtual service if persistence is set.

Tested-by: Deon van der Merwe <dvdm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

--- 

I believe that this fixes a bug and as such is suitable for -stable.
However, Its taken a few release for anyone to bring this to our attention,
so it doesn't seem to be causing much pain in the wild.

Discussion of this problem:
http://archive.linuxvirtualserver.org/html/lvs-users/2009-11/msg00043.html

diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c
index e01061f..9a4ccd4 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c
@@ -1188,8 +1188,9 @@ ip_vs_add_service(struct ip_vs_service_user_kern *u,
 	svc->af = u->af;
 	svc->protocol = u->protocol;
 	ip_vs_addr_copy(svc->af, &svc->addr, &u->addr);
-	svc->port = u->port;
 	svc->fwmark = u->fwmark;
+	if (!svc->fwmark)
+		svc->port = u->port;
 	svc->flags = u->flags;
 	svc->timeout = u->timeout * HZ;
 	svc->netmask = u->netmask;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux