Patrick McHardy wrote: > kendo wrote: >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "kendo" <kendo999@xxxxxxxx> >> To: "Patrick McHardy" <kaber@xxxxxxxxx> >> Sent: Monday, November 23, 2009 7:12 PM >> Subject: Re: Is this nf_conn "use" counter bug??? >> >> >>>> This code looks like from the 2.4 era. >>> ----I'm sorry, I copy from 2.6.12,not 2.6.30.9.Because I also opened up them. >>> >>>> Most likely there's an skb leak somewhere and the conntrack references >>>> are not released. >>> ----Yes, I think so.But why is that so??kfree_skb function has not been properly invoked when skb leave? > > Possibly. You can check the skbuff caches in /proc/slabinfo to see > whether this is the case. > >>>>> Environment: >>>>> -----internet--cisco switch (two port bonding)-----linux box(two bridge)----cisco switch(two port bonging)---server >>>>> >>>>> Cisco switch link aggregation，use two port.Linux box have two Independent network bridge. >>> (ge0/1) ---------------(eth0) (eth1)------------(ge1/0/1) >>> ---interface-----cisco switch 1 linux box cisco switch 2--------servers >>> (ge0/2)----------------(eth2) (eth3)------------(ge1/0/1) >>> >>> switch 1: >>> port 0/1 and port 0/2 link aggregation >>> >>> switch 2: >>> port 1/0/1 and port 1/0/2 link aggregation > > So you're bridging two ports which are connected to aggregated links? > What is the purpose of doing this? Ah I see this was a misunderstanding. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
