----- Original Message -----
From: "kendo" <kendo999@xxxxxxxx>
To: "Patrick McHardy" <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, November 23, 2009 7:12 PM
Subject: Re: Is this nf_conn "use" counter bug???
>
>> This code looks like from the 2.4 era.
> ----I'm sorry, I copy from 2.6.12,not 2.6.30.9.Because I also opened up them.
>
>> Most likely there's an skb leak somewhere and the conntrack references
>> are not released.
> ----Yes, I think so.But why is that so??kfree_skb function has not been properly invoked when skb leave?
>
>>> Environment:
>>> -----internet--cisco switch (two port bonding)-----linux box(two bridge)----cisco switch(two port bonging)---server
>>>
>>> Cisco switch link aggregation，use two port.Linux box have two Independent network bridge.
>>
> (ge0/1) ---------------(eth0) (eth1)------------(ge1/0/1)
> ---interface-----cisco switch 1 linux box cisco switch 2--------servers
> (ge0/2)----------------(eth2) (eth3)------------(ge1/0/1)
>
> switch 1:
> port 0/1 and port 0/2 link aggregation
>
> switch 2:
> port 1/0/1 and port 1/0/2 link aggregation
>
> linux config:
> eth0, eth1 => bridge0 up, no ip, stp off.
> eth2, eth3 => bridge1 up, no ip, stp off.
> 2.6.30.9
> xeon 5420 *8
> intel 82575 * 8(version 2.0.6 or linux 2.6.30.9 inside)
> iptables rule:
> no any thing
>
> no other config.
>
> thanks
>
> kendo��.n��������+%������w��{.n����z�����n�r������&��z�ޗ�zf���h���~����������_��+v���)ߣ�m
