Re: [PATCH] iptables: expose option to zero packet and byte counters for a specific rule using iptables/ip6tables

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Mohit,


On Wednesday 2009-08-19 22:41, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>
>>I was able to cleanly apply the attached modified patches to the
>> latest iptables code. Also, below is the code in text if attachment
>> doesn't reach.
>>
>>Subject: [PATCH] expose option to zero packet and byte counters for a specific rule using iptables
>
>
>I wonder what the real-world use of this is, apart from
>rule debugging (for which -j TRACE seems better anyhow).

That was meant to be a question. Could you please let me know why 
exactly -Z # was needed? I guess there was some large value seen in it 
given you were sending it from Vyatta, so I would like to know. If it 
was just an experiment and TRACE and/or quota2 (Xta) was sufficient in 
regards to you accomplishing whatever the intention was to, please also 
let me know so that I can possibly discard the branch with your -Z#
submission.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux