Re: [PATCH] iptables: expose option to zero packet and byte counters for a specific rule using iptables/ip6tables

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wednesday 2009-08-19 19:56, Mohit Mehta wrote:

>I was able to cleanly apply the attached modified patches to the
> latest iptables code. Also, below is the code in text if attachment
> doesn't reach.
>
>build-vm:/# cat iptables.c.patch
>>From 4dbfcfeb9fc65df7fac1f16230871c02a85b4ea1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>From: root <root@build-vm.(none)>
>Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 14:03:50 -0700
>Subject: [PATCH] expose option to zero packet and byte counters for a specific rule using iptables


I wonder what the real-world use of this is, apart from
rule debugging (for which -j TRACE seems better anyhow).


I queued these patches (since I guess they won't apply elsewhere
again ;-) with reservation provision, fixed the trailing whitespace, and 
added the missing manpage updates. Pull requests follows soon.
(It's in git://dev.medozas.de/iptables master already)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux