On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 10:53:22AM -0400, Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Wed, 9 Sep 2009, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > If the embedded guys are OK with an additional pointer in the slab data > > structure, I have no objection to this approach. I am assuming that we > > would use the usual ops-style structure full of pointers to functions > > in order to avoid a pair of extra pointers. > > This would also allow us to get rid of the ctor pointer in > kmem_cache_create(). We can put it into the same structure. Sounds good -- that would result in no increase in size. Could even add a dtor if people want it. ;-) (Sorry, couldn't resist...) Thanx, Paul -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
