Sorry for duplicates.
--- Em ter, 23/6/09, Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx> escreveu:
Does the problem go away if you call it indirectly? Like:
stop_trigger.function = myfunc;
...
myfunc(void)
{
nf_unregister_hook(&nf_hook);
}
Hi,
I've got a very similar question, about scheduling nf_register_hook,
and since I'm already calling it indirectly, I think this could prove
useful to both of us. I'd appreciate if anybody could help.
This is what I'm trying to do:
void foo () {
unsigned long parameter;
...
DEFINE_TIMER( timer, secfoo, jiffies + 250, parameter);
...
add_timer(timer);
}
void secfoo( unsigned long param ) {
...
nf_register_hook(...);
...
}
If I comment the "add_timer(timer);" and put "secfoo( parameter );"
instead, it works out, though it doesn't help me, because I wanted to
schedule it. The way it is, I get a kernel panic.
Good day,
Bruno Fiss
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
