Re: nf_unregister_hook problem

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



--- Em ter, 23/6/09, Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx> escreveu:


>
> Does the problem go away if you call it indirectly? Like:
>
>
> stop_trigger.function = myfunc;
> ...
>
> myfunc(void)
> {
>     nf_unregister_hook(&nf_hook);
> }
>


Hi,

I've got a very similar question, about scheduling nf_register_hook, and since I'm already calling it indirectly, I think this could prove useful to both of us. I'd appreciate if anybody could help.

This is what I'm trying to do:

void foo () {
        unsigned long parameter;
        ...
        DEFINE_TIMER( timer, secfoo, jiffies + 250, parameter);
        ...
        add_timer(timer);
}

void secfoo( unsigned long param ) {
        ...
        nf_register_hook(...);
        ...
}

If I comment the "add_timer(timer);" and put "secfoo( parameter );" instead, it works out, though it doesn't help me, because I wanted to schedule it. The way it is, I get a kernel panic.

Good day,

Bruno Fiss


      Veja quais são os assuntos do momento no Yahoo! +Buscados
http://br.maisbuscados.yahoo.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux