Re: Compiling ebtables statically or dynamically results in different behaviour

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 11:49 AM, bdschuym@xxxxxxxxxx
<bdschuym@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> What is your exact command and what type of processor are you using?
>

The command run is "ebtables -N 1000"

This is /proc/cpuinfo :
processor       : 0
vendor_id       : GenuineIntel
cpu family      : 6
model           : 23
model name      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU           E5430  @ 2.66GHz
stepping        : 6
cpu MHz         : 2666.758
cache size      : 6144 KB
physical id     : 0
siblings        : 1
core id         : 0
cpu cores       : 1
fpu             : yes
fpu_exception   : yes
cpuid level     : 10
wp              : yes
flags           : fpu tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic mtrr mca cmov pat pse36
clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm syscall lm constant_tsc
pni monitor ds_cpl vmx est tm2 cx16 xtpr lahf_lm
bogomips        : 6669.91
clflush size    : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes   : 38 bits physical, 48 bits virtual

It's a standard Intel Xeon (the server is a IBM HS21 Blade).

Regards,
Tim

-- 
Tim Verhoeven - tim.verhoeven.be@xxxxxxxxx - 0479 / 88 11 83

Hoping the problem  magically goes away  by ignoring it is the
"microsoft approach to programming" and should never be allowed.
(Linus Torvalds)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux