What is your exact command and what type of processor are you using? cheers, Bart >----- Oorspronkelijk bericht ----- >Van : Tim Verhoeven [mailto:tim.verhoeven.be@xxxxxxxxx] >Verzonden : dinsdag , april 7, 2009 03:53 PM >Aan : netfilter-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >Onderwerp : Compiling ebtables statically or dynamically results in different behaviour > >Hi, > >I have a very strange problem with ebtables. I'm using it on CentOS 5 >(2.6.18 kernel) and when using the dynamically compiled version >(version 2.0.8-2) I can't create a new chain. When using the same >version but compiled statically it works. The difference is clearly to >see when using a strace : > >Good behavior (statically compiled) : > >setsockopt(3, SOL_IP, 0x80 /* IP_??? */, >"filter\0\0\0\352tv;\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0008\2\0\0\0\0\0\0"..., 312) >= 0 >exit_group(0) = ? > > >Bad behavior (dynamically compiled) : > >setsockopt(3, SOL_IP, 0x80 /* IP_??? */, >"filter\0\0\0\352tv;\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0e\3\0\0\0\0\0\0"..., 312) = >-1 EINVAL (Invalid argument) >write(2, "The kernel doesn't support a cer"..., 113The kernel doesn't >support a certain ebtables extension, consider recompiling your kernel >or insmod the extension) = 113 >write(2, ".\n", 2. >) = 2 >exit_group(-1) = ? > >For some reason the one version sets different options then the other. >I've tried different things (compiling against the standard kernel >include files (kernel-devel), compiling against the included include >files, using some gcc options, ...). But none of those worked. Any >hints are appreciated. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
