On Friday 2009-02-20 17:51, Ralf wrote: > > Hmm. Jan, I'm afraid there is more to fix because of the fact > that rulenum is mostly optional... > The main question here is: must rulenum come before OR after the chain? >+" %s -I chain [rulenum] rule-specification [options]\n" As an exception to standard getopt practices, -I, and a few others, can take two args (chain and rulenum). Given this knowledge, it becomes obvious that the order is mandatory. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
