Thomas Jarosch wrote:
On Monday, 16. February 2009 11:38:49 you wrote:
I think the 3.x versions don't do this by default, so as long as they're
supported by the kernel, we should expect people to use them and not
assume defaults of later versions.
Thanks for clearing this up, Philip and Patrick.
So we've got so far:
1. Better readbility by writing "xyz = NULL;"
2. Correct and a tiny bit larger code using gcc 3
3. Correct and compact code using gcc 4 (released April 2005).
I guess the assembler code generated from gcc 3 <-> gcc 4
will have other performance/size differences,
but it's Patrick's final decision what to do :-)
I actually prefer no initializers for two reasons:
- it avoids these discussions that come up once every couple
of months :)
- they're useless
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
