Re: 32 core net-next stack/netfilter "scaling"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Eric Dumazet wrote:
Rick Jones a écrit :
Anyhow, the spread on trans/s/netperf is now 600 to 500 or 6000, which
does represent an improvement.


Yes indeed you have a speedup, tcp conntracking is OK.

You now hit the nf_conntrack_lock spinlock we have in generic conntrack code (net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c)

nf_ct_refresh_acct() for instance has to lock it.

We really want some finer locking here.

That looks more complicated since it requires to take multiple locks
occasionally (f.i. hash insertion, potentially helper-related and
expectation-related stuff), and there is the unconfirmed_list, where
fine-grained locking can't really be used without changing it to
a hash.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux