On Wed, 2008-12-31 at 17:00 -0500, Matt Cross wrote:
> I think the work to move ebtables to use xtables broke ebtables.
> Specifically, in commit 8cc784eec6676b58e7f60419c88179aaa97bf71c the
> return value of the match functions was inverted so that they return 1
> (true) on matches instead of EBT_MATCH (0), and vice versa (look in
> ebt_ip.c). The logic in ebtables.c (ebt_do_table() and
> EBT_MATCH_ITERATE()) expect match functions to return 0 for matches.
>
> The patch at the end of this message fixes the problem, but seems a
> little hacky to me. Who's the right person to address this?
>
> -Matt
I suspect the right place to send this is:
netfilter-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
The subject line should indicate that you've contributed a patch
otherwise you may not get a quick response (I've modified it
accordingly).
For more on submitting patches you can read
Documentation/SubmittingPatches and Documentation/SubmitChecklist
Cheers,
-Matt Helsley
>
> --- linux-2.6.28.orig/net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c 2008-12-24
> 18:26:37.000000000 -0500
> +++ linux-2.6.28/net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c 2008-12-31
> 16:17:44.000000000 -0500
> @@ -80,7 +80,7 @@
> {
> par->match = m->u.match;
> par->matchinfo = m->data;
> - return m->u.match->match(skb, par);
> + return !m->u.match->match(skb, par);
> }
>
> static inline int ebt_dev_check(char *entry, const struct net_device *device)
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
