On Thursday 2008-11-13 23:18, Adam Nielsen wrote: >> > +/* >> > + * Known issues: >> > + * >> > + * - It's possible to add multiple led triggers with the same name (as >> > + * set with --led-trigger-id) >> > + * >> > + */ >> >> So fix this? > > I don't know how :-( Since the LED hardware class doesn't (to my knowledge) > allow you to get a list of available LED triggers on the system, But it may allow you to *test* the presence using something like checkentry() { ... char buf[]; strcpy(buf,"netfilter-"); strcat(buf,name); if (led_get(buf) != NULL) { printk(KERN_WARNING "That thing already exists\n"); return false; } ... } No? In that case, you could keep a list of names withint he module itself: struct name_entry { struct list_head list; char *name; } struct list_head known_names; checkentry() { char buf[]; ... list_for_each_entry(i, known_names, list) if (strcmp(buf, i->name) == 0) { printk("that already exists\n"); return false; } ... i = kmalloc(*i, GFP_KERNEL); i->name = strdup(buf); list_add(&known_names, &i->list); } something like that.. > I'd have to > have some sort of global list that I append to every time a trigger is > created. Given the likelihood of this happening (and the fact that it mostly > works having two triggers with the same name, it just looks bad) I didn't > think it was important enough for the additional code. I will let others judge that ;-) > If this functionality is added to the LED class then I will happily update > my code to make use of it. Yeah it would be best if the led class provided something. (preferably a btree/hashlookup) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html