Hi, On Wednesday 15 October 2008, Patrick McHardy wrote: > KOVACS Krisztian wrote: > > On Wednesday 15 October 2008, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > >> A bit of forward planning would not have been bad; like using a > >> "union nf_inet_addr laddr" for a future IPv6 expansion, since those > >> pesky structs (xt_mymodule) tend be quite fixed and when they > >> change, they require a new revision. > > > > You're right. However I don't consider adding a new revision much of > > a problem when adding IPv6 support -- that is a major new feature > > anyway. > > > > But I think we're still on time: feel free to submit a patch to DaveM > > which changes the kernel side as well as a patch to the iptables > > modules. > > It would be good to avoid adding more of these ugly revisions, > so yeah, feel free to send patches :) Yeah, and of course don't send it to Dave, send it to Patrick. I'm a bit absent-minded today so don't expect meaningful mails from me... -- KOVACS Krisztian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html