KOVACS Krisztian wrote:
On Wednesday 15 October 2008, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
A bit of forward planning would not have been bad; like using a
"union nf_inet_addr laddr" for a future IPv6 expansion, since those
pesky structs (xt_mymodule) tend be quite fixed and when they change,
they require a new revision.
You're right. However I don't consider adding a new revision much of a
problem when adding IPv6 support -- that is a major new feature anyway.
But I think we're still on time: feel free to submit a patch to DaveM
which changes the kernel side as well as a patch to the iptables modules.
It would be good to avoid adding more of these ugly revisions,
so yeah, feel free to send patches :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
